The Nittany Turkey

Primarily about Penn State football, this is a tale told by idiots, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

Search This Site

Enter keyword(s) below to search for relevant articles.

Home Archives for Clery Act

Sudden Impact: Rumours

Posted on Written by

I know you’re hopin’ to find someone who’s gonna give you peace of mind.

When times go bad, when times get rough, won’t you lay me down in the tall grass and let me do my stuff.

I’m just second-hand news, I’m just second-hand newsssssssssss…

Fleetwood Mac sang “Second Hand News” back in 1977, even before Penn State met Alabama head-on at the goal line in that fateful 14-7 Sugar Bowl loss back in our callow days of Nittany Lion innocence when Sandusky was the name of a coach, not a scandal, and, hell, before some of you young whippersnappers were even born. The album was “Rumours,” which quickly went platinum, having been carried by Stevie Nicks’ mournful croaking of the hauntingly overplayed “Dreams.”

So much for my career as a musical historian—I’ll keep my crystal visions to myself. Therefore, let us abruptly shuck our reveries of mystical musical “rumours” and segue to Penn State’s notorious Board of Trustees. The subject of today’s Sudden Impact is rumors, spelled the American way, with heartfelt Turkey thanks to Noah Webster for removing the unnecessary “U”.

Tuning into Twitter, the Internet’s version of “Can You Top This?”, one encounters a surfeit of Penn State rumors. This week’s potential activities seem to be at the temporal focal point of speculation connected to the much maligned (deservedly) BoT. Well, hell, everything Penn State does or has had done to it involves the BoT either directly or indirectly. Accordingly, the fact that those university overseers are holding an open meeting this weekend has generated a maelstrom of speculation about the reasoning behind and the timing of the meeting.

The Star Trekkian term “damage control” entered into the Tweetsteria at some point. Yeah, the board has done lots of PR damage by being a bunch of putzes (and Peetzes) with respect to accepting the flawed Freeh report and scurrying on with a laser focus on the future. Coherent light beams aside, the board seems to want to publicly present the impression that it is open to governance changes and suggestions. Naturally, Penn Staters for Responsible Stewardship (PS4RS) has a keen interest in any forum that is even ostensibly poised to meet the challenge of improving oversight; thus, PS4RS is coordinating representation at the public sessions, to wit:

The BoT will be holding a retreat this weekend that will include public sessions. Penn Staters for Responsible Stewardship (PS4RS) is currently looking for alumni, students and friends of Penn State interested in attending the August 25 & 26 Board of Trustees Public Meeting. It is very important that the Penn State community remain engaged in the dealings of the Board of Trustees to reinforce our position as stakeholders of our University.

The August meeting will be held over two days in Room 207 at The Penn Stater Conference Center Hotel, University Park, Pennsylvania. Public session meeting times are listed below. Please note times may adjust slightly.

Saturday, August 25 – 3:45 pm until 5 pm

Sunday, August 26 – 9 am until 2 pm

The agenda: http://www.psu.edu/trustees/agenda/scheduleaugust2012.html 

PS4RS is looking to have a delegation of members attend the meeting. Dress is recommended to be what you would wear to a business meeting.

Please fill in the survey below so our event coordinators can contact prior to the meeting.

REGISTER TO ATTEND THE MEETING

Now, back to the Tweetanoid rumors.

One rumor that is at least partially based on fact is that former president Graham Spanier will spill the beans from his perspective, perhaps via ESPN, during this week. He and his lawyers have been hinting at a press conference for a couple of weeks now. Tweeps are saying that it will happen this week, and that the board is quaking in its boots. Ooh, baby, baby, Spanier has big connections and knows what’s going on in everyone’s closet! He can bring down some big-ass trustees with one stroke of his mighty mouth, er pen, or whatever. OMG heads will roll! So goes the thinking of the Titans of Twitterbole, anyway. More likely, Spanier is planning the presser just to cover his own ass, as he has avoided criminal charges thus far but is certainly not immune from indictment. Give us your best shrug, Graham baby!

Another rumor is that the Clery Act investigation being conducted by the US Department of Education will come to a head this week, and OMG heads will roll. Let me not be too facetious here, as this one has credence, at least with respect to the potential that Penn State will take a serious hit from the investigation’s findings. In the worst case, PSU could incur a large fine, in addition to the possibility of losing federal grant money, student aid, and loans. So, yeah, it’s a big deal, and while much of the Freeh report can be disputed, there is enough good data in it to leave little doubt that Penn State was seriously out of compliance with the law. (We won’t debate the merit of the onerous record keeping and statistics generation required by the law, which is bureaucratic overkill typical of reactionary legislation. Suffice to say that it is the law.) The Executive Branch of the sitting administration in Washington seems to recognize no boundaries, and with a presidential election right around the corner, Penn State’s dirty laundry makes it the perfect target for yet another grandstand play. The dubiously good news is that the maximum fine levied thus far for violations of the Clery Act has been $350,000, a mere drop in the bucket compared to the $60 million assessed against PSU by the NCAA. However, that amount is chump change compared to what loss of Federal grant funding would cost Penn State. Furthermore, for political reasons I’ve already stated, Penn State is likely to break the record for fines, just to add insult to injury. On this one, be afraid! Be very afraid! The phone calls are coming from inside the apartment!

Of course, we’ve already covered the accreditation warning by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education, which stated that Penn State’s accreditation was “in jeopardy.” We attributed this slack-jawed quasi-threat to a vortex generated by a liberal interpretation of the Freeh report and the validation provided by the NCAA’s sanctimonious sanctions, stirred by the ubiquitous, vindictive Vicky Triponey’s input to her new boss, who just happens to be chair of the accreditation committee. Yeah, sure, we here at the Turkey have been known to start a rumor or two ourselves! While the Philadelphia Inquirer doesn’t think there’s much danger here, the coupling of loss of accreditation with loss of Federal funds would be absolutely devastating.

Other rumors swirl around The Second Mile’s connections with highly placed Pennsylvania politicians. There is probably lots of dirt to be dug up following the money there. In some cases, though, Tweepsters are giving the governor a free ride by misdirecting their vitriol toward social welfare agencies and police departments when they should be setting their sights higher. Follow the money! This Turkey sees the faint glimmer of the 24K real stuff among the plethora of fool’s gold nuggets — big-time politics is a dirty game, one dirty hand washes the other, and so on, and so on. On the surface, we see a mutual protection society composed of Governor Tom Corbett, the board of trustees, and Rod Erickson. Let the digging commence. Much as Joe Paterno’s denouement served as a smokescreen for the board of trustees’ culpability, so could the Penn State situation in its entirety be a big diversion from a major statewide scandal.

That does it for rumors. Sometimes, where there’s smoke, there’s fire. Other times, the smoke and mirrors send you way astray of the mark. Trust your intellect and judgment to separate the worthy ones from the pure folly. And keep on Tweetin’.

******

Joe Posnanski’s biography of Joe Paterno is available today. This Turkey has a copy and will begin reading it forthwith. Advance copies were given to the media, so there are plenty of reviews out there. Among them:

******

I’ve bloviated incessantly, so let me now cess with a touch of ironic humor from Jeff Byers of StateCollege.com, who reports that Penn State will be revamping its hygiene policies, enjoining shower-taking on campus.

 

Have you any dreams you’d like to sell? Try eBay. I ain’t buying.

Bully!

Posted on Written by

In a recent interview, alumni elected Penn State trustee Anthony Lubrano called the NCAA collectively a bully, and followed with, “the only way to deal with a bully is head on.” Lubrano is incontrovertibly correct, and he summed up what I have been thinking ever since President Rod Erickson and the Penn State Board of Trustees capitulated to the NCAA’s draconian sanctions.

No fight at all? Erickson and those trustees who support him, an overwhelming majority of the 32-member board, have continued to fall back on the excuse that the alternative to the NCAA sanctions would have been much worse, that the offer of the sanctions was non-negotiable, and that the best thing for the university was to take its lumps and move forward in order to get the Sandusky mess behind us and live for a better day ahead.

But it’s liable to get worse before it gets better. How much worse is anybody’s guess. For it is an uneasy peace when one chooses to appease a bully.

Ask Neville Chamberlain’s ghost. The British Prime Minister thought that it was necessary to appease Hitler to achieve “peace in our time.” At the Munich Conference of 1938, Chamberlain traded part of Czechoslovakia for a promise that the Germans and Brits would go away happy and European life would return to normal with the major threat having been appeased. But a bully will always be a bully. Hitler ignored the non-aggression pact, invading Poland and starting World War II.

If there’s a lesson to be gleaned from this historical snippet it’s that when one shows weakness to a bully, he better have eyes in the back of his head, for there will always be threats lurking in the shadows. Other bullies tend to take notice that there’s a weakling who is ripe for the taking and won’t offer much resistance. A show of bluster is all that is needed to get him to give up his lunch money. If there’s any resistance, give him a black eye and take the money. He won’t fight back.

And so it appears that Penn State has unwittingly, masochistically invited others besides the NCAA to come take its lunch money — lots of it.

Immediately following NCAA President Mark Emmert’s announcement of sanctions against Penn State, the Big Ten Conference jumped into the fray, augmenting the football program’s woes by imposing additional sanctions. Then, the Middle States Commission on Higher Education, the academic accreditation body, declared Penn State “in jeopardy” of losing its accreditation. Lurking in the shadows are the Clery Act investigation by the US Department of Education, perhaps dozens of civil lawsuits from Sandusky’s victims and their families, perjury trials for Tim Curley and Gary Schultz, potential felony prosecution of former President Graham Spanier, and who knows what else? It is easy to be paranoid when the knives continue to rain down. And through it all, the media have been slamming Penn State — because it’s easy.

Accepting the NCAA sanctions without a peep also validated the conclusions of the Freeh report, which Emmert used as the basis for his “deal”. Instead of conducting a proper, NCAA-led investigation, Emmert and his henchmen chose to wave the Freeh report at Erickson to see if he’d cave in. Throw in a couple of threats of rocks thrown through the windows of Old Main, killing off the football program, and assorted other sundry imperilments, and here’s the deal: take it or leave it. An offer you can’t refuse. And by the way, no leaks. Keep your mouth shut. Omerta. Or else!

That opened the door to everyone else to use the strong language of the Freeh report to support their cases against Penn State, against which they could conclude they would receive little resistance.

Of course, it is the NCAA, not a single university, that is culpable for transforming academic institutions into football factories. The opportunity was ripe for the NCAA to make Penn State a target in order to take the bulls-eye off their own backs. The NCAA must discipline member schools regularly for this reason. We’ll see how unhypocritical they are with the way they handle UNC, but let me not digress.

That Erickson and his good ole boys and girls on the board chose to accept the Freeh report’s conclusions without question is another facilitating factor for the bullies out there. Of course the BoT paid big bucks for the former FBI director’s report, reportedly $6.5 million, so why question it? It was bought and paid for, a ready excuse not to pursue any issues related to its findings. By virtue of the ivory tower’s acceptance of not only the report, but also the bullies’ use of it to justify their punishments, it has essentially become a declaration of guilt: we did it, we did it all, and we’ll pay the price to atone for it, amen.

However, several interested bystanders who have chosen to ignore the machinations in Old Main have found significant flaws in the Freeh report. Its description of the supposedly corrupt football culture at Penn State is certainly subjective, yet it is the cornerstone for the NCAA’s and others’ case against the university. How can a climate in which academic issues had repeatedly caused suspensions of big-name players be described as deficient academically? How could a top football program with a top of the heap graduation rate be described as corrupt. Those Freeh report words appear to be the cart that drags the horse: as if Freeh conducted the investigation with the object being to prove the notion of a corrupt football culture, instead of deriving that from his findings.

Does the board have something to hide? Why are they not questioning these flaws in the Freeh report? Is there a bigger scandal they’re attempting to keep buried beneath the troubled turf of this one? Better that we find out about it sooner than later, before the bullies snatch more lunch money.

It will come out in the wash. It cannot be be swept under the rug. Thanks to inquisitive, cynical trustees like Lubrano, Joel Myers, and Ryan McCombie, along with former Penn State players, the Paterno family, and investigative reporters such as Sara Ganim, the truth will eventually be revealed. When it does, a lot of people in higher places than Old Main will get hurt. But history has shown that the lust for power leads to serious risk taking to cling to power.

Meanwhile, the board will keep trying to back itself into a corner, ostensibly maintaining a “laser focus” on the future. The bullies will keep on bullying, and the sheep will continue to graze while maintaining their laser focus. Don’t be surprised if one day that damn laser starts focusing on them.